Promulgation by the President of the Republic, who has the power to refer bills back to Parliament for reconsideration. Black people were over 3 times as likely to be arrested as White people - there were 32 arrests for every 1,000 Black people, and 10 arrests for every 1,000 White people. But under Italy's justice system, the supreme court is unlikely to hear the case until April or May 2015. The most significant rights and powers are attributed to the parties in a case (a public prosecutor on one side and a defence lawyer on the other). If they are fundamentally distinct, the judge will be entitled to hold that the precedent has no applicability in the instant case, according the distinguishing rule, and will issue a new decision which will become a new binding precedent[8]. Retrieved from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-politicalscience/chapter/origins-of-american-law/. External independence does not just apply to the moment when the prosecutor decides upon penal action: the prosecutor is fully independent even during the investigation phase, during which he or she directs the police. At the end of the civil trial, the court can issue one of the following verdicts: That the claim cannot be granted for issues concerning the procedure or the merits of the claim (because the procedure set up by the claimant is not the correct one or the claimant has no legal standing). The constitutional system provides for the following separation of powers: Parliament is vested with the legislative power. HN0~x=(HzkRDQY!z7%Wuxv7k6Z computer manufacturer whose litigation experience had hitherto been confined mostly to the Italian legal system. att. 6 Key Ways the British Legal System Differs From the Rest of the World They can also help to improve them. [7] Dissenting opinions constitute obiter dicta. If the case is serious, in particular, they are effectively in charge of the investigation. Amanda Knox: European court orders Italy to pay damages Facts and evidence are gathered by both the defense and prosecutor and judged by a jury which is a group of regular citizens that are instructed by the judge to make a judgment based on the laws, evidence, and facts that the judge will then make a verdict. Legal system DEFINITION: A brief description of the legal system's historical roots, role in government, and acceptance of International Court of Justice (ICJ) jurisdiction. The Common law/Civil law dualism has always been pivotal for any scholar approaching the study of Comparative law. No specific reporting restrictions typically apply at any stage preceding or during a civil trial. italian justice system compared to uk Found inside - Page 29here was once an Italian computer manufacturer whose British subsidiary sold an expensive system to a large solicitors' . The Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court are both based in Rome. State courts can hear almost any kind of case including federal issues as well as constitutional ones, but they are subject to the oversight of the United States (Baum, 2013). Despite this, traditionally case law has always played a large role in law-making. Ordinary first instance judges preside over the courts (. According to case law, for the standard of proof to be met, the court must find that it is reasonably likely that the alleged facts happened or that it is more likely than not compared to other facts alleged during the trial. One aspect of the Knox-Sollecito case that most coverage omits to mention is that it is has now been analysed by three prosecutors (at least), a preliminary investigation judge, a preliminary hearing judge, a first instance court, two courts of appeal, the Italian Supreme Court and a significant number of skilled police officers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. 65, regio decreto n. 12 del 1941. Congress is heavily involved throughout the process of appointing federal judges such as the selection of candidates and confirmation of candidates. There were nearly 50,000 such claims compared to 3,500 in 2003. The Italian constitution and acts of parliament set out a system whereby criminal prosecutors are fully independent; in particular, they have external independence from all the other constitutional powers. endstream endobj 1355 0 obj <>stream Conviction, if the accused is proven to be guilty of the alleged offence beyond any reasonable doubt. Consequently, the influence of the Parliament on the development of law has increased immeasurably in recent years, with a legislative hyperactivity that brought to a process of statutorification of the common law principles developed throughout the years into detailed statutes of general application, while the influence of judges has correspondingly decreased, limited to administrate the justice at most interpreting the statutes if they let so and leaving the law- making task to the legislative body, more in accordance with the principle of separation of powers and of supremacy of the Parliament. This is the result of a specific constitutional choice of maintaining the principle of separation of powers very rigid: the Judicial body must not interfere with the legislative power of the Parliament, whose members are directly elected by the people and which therefore is the only one which has the democratic legitimacy to create law[10]. More serious crimes and civil cases in both countries are then subject to a three-court hierarchy. The court, if summoned, cannot declare its incompetency. To promulgate the amendment, the majority of voters must approve it in the referendum. The main role of the judiciary in both civil and criminal trials is to: Govern the hearings and the proceedings, order the parties to file further written statements and set hearings. The Italian criminal justice system is sometimes branded as semi-adversarial, but its legal culture and the Italian law in action in fact demonstrate an inquisitorial approach to fact-finding. In many ways, it is very different from the system in the United States. 384 Codice di Procedura Civile, (Regio Decreto 28 ottobre 1940, n. 1443 in G.U. [4] From Latin maxim stare decisis et quieta non muovere, literally let the decision stand and dont unsettle what is. Jointly by fine and imprisonment of up to four years. The applicable sanctions on a conviction are: Various forms of detention including imprisonment or house detention. The intent of this paper is to analyze the legal system of two countries, England and Italy, which historically have a very strong tradition of Common and Civil law being the latter the leading exponent and exporter of the first system, and the former a direct descendant of the Roman law tradition to assess whether effectively those two systems are diametrically the opposite or instead they might be running together, but in parallel, towards a certain point of coincidence. ;vfm4u s(Jm ` *X^=sV9TSFoMcYBW+ [G{H{#R/AAG#&/$(jiwzjjDr7}BGT*rDC0?~`n;NUj\~wSSt| ghofQ-~b8 -M0y:j_c+135FiYzXP+8XLABEJdDfgrK3,}qsL$>ZEQF\,^}$J3"D*zCde~I'KorztmZ!C=rlG(EFYsoY%z5'pKp_/"e7@ y R SAB C3 Parties usually refer to previous decisions of the lower courts and the Supreme Court of Cassation in interpreting the law, but they are not directly bound by them. italian justice system compared to uk - opportunityzonehub.org And that is the reason why we will not find any reference to the jurisprudence among the Italian legislative sources[11], but only to the statutes. As we have seen above, in Italy the Constant Jurisprudence doctrine combined with the Nomofilactic function of the Supreme Court consent to reach almost the same results of the English Stare Decisis principle, aiming to satisfy the needs of equality of treatment and predictability of the decisions without giving up the characteristic of legal certainty typical of a code-centric legal system, but being at the same time flexible and capable to easily adapt the general written rules to the varying and unforeseen conditions of society without turning to the very slow parliamentary law-making process[17]. [2] The common law is judicially created law that is developed on a case by case basis, wrote Chief Justice Hannah of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in Mason v State. Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. Other special courts provided by the Constitution include the: Administrative appeal court, which is the Council of State (. It is true that in common law decisions are considered law according to the Stare Decisis principle, but it is as much true that in civil law systems, although decisions might have only persuasive force, the more cases are decided with consistent reasoning the more weight they acquire: this is the phenomenon of Constant Jurisprudence, a way to give quasi legislative effects to the Italian pronounces without violating the principle of separation of powers. In Italy there is a constitutional right to appeal on points of law to the Court of Cassation, which can agree with the Court of Appeals decision or can disagree with its interpretation of the law. Therefore, although Supreme Courts precedents are not binding, Italian lower Courts will follow them either way because they are strongly persuasive in their legal reasoning and because they know in advance that different decisions will be quashed if they are not supported by reasonings convincing enough to change Courts mind. However, the United States law has now diverged from its English ancestor in both substance and procedure (Boundless, N.d). In particular, commentators have focused on the central role of the cases prosecutor something poorly understood outside Italys distinctive legal culture. There are limited exceptions, for example cases involving: Underage defendants: these are not open to the public and the names of the defendants are not made public. In the United States we grant a trial by a jury of one's peers for felony defendants if they request it. I will support MacKinnon's ideas on gender equality, briefly summarize Crenshaw's discussion of intersectionality, and provide an analysis of the court's approach to gender in at least three cases. The Civil law system, indeed, entirely relies on the legislative source of law. The Q&A gives a high-level overview of the key legal concepts including the constitution, system of governance and the general legislative process; the main sources of law; the court structure and hierarchy; the judiciary and its appointment; the general rules of civil and criminal litigation, including reporting restrictions, evidentiary requirements, the roles of the judge and counsel, burdens of proof and penalties. Courts in Italy are divided into their specialties which include civil courts, criminal courts, and administrative courts. Sexual abuse: these can be closed or partially closed. As the Constitutional Court has stated, this principle is intended to guarantee equality before the law within the penal process. *You can also browse our support articles here >, Boundless. The Italian civil judicial system is based on a two-tier justice system that allows for the reconsideration of a case that had been decided (Mondials, N.d.). Retrieved from http://www.picchieassociati.it/ENG/more-details/the-italian-law-system. Common law countries are adopting some of the characteristics of the Civil law system, while Civil law countries are incorporating some features of the Common law tradition. The defendant (accused person) who, through their counsel, presents the defence version of the facts and evidence. The President is also the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces and chairs the Superior Council of the Judiciary. Italian criminal law is primarily an adversarial system (as opposed to the inquisitorial system). (g7J$&r^3*;v|d) *A,l ii @!P2Yx KD-KGHBFcFLY+3C04#DQ5"a j8 *2I1H8l 0;.2j 1AS Xxy&s7?4q2~^fasT$fdyKD`^DP @1,`S/47CY'%@ &d`G However, since Italy is a member of the European Union, which makes the European Union legislation the next source of law (Lawyersitaly, 2020). If a party believes that law is unconstitutional or breaches any part of the Constitution, the party can file a motion before Corte Costitutzionale through the judge of the pending proceeding where the issue is raised (Grossi, 2010). Retrieved from https://www.lawyersitaly.eu/civil-law-in-italy, Mondials. BAME communities make up 14% of the UK population, but represent 25% . 1979) Therefore, the Normans, under command of Henry II, wishing to establish a unified legal system that would become common throughout the country, sent out itinerant judges with the task of ensuring a standardized system of law all across the country, issuing uniform decisions based upon a set of common principles which begun to be crystalized in those decisions: these are the first examples of case-law, and that is the beginning of the Common law, a law common to all English people, in England and all over its colonies. The courts are not only involved in the court proceedings but are also involved in the investigation which means that the prosecutor and the judge work together when finding out the facts of the case. Judges are bound by the law, not by the previous decisions of higher courts. Under stare decisis, a single case that has been decided upon is binding law to the same extent as a statute or regulation in common law systems. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! In this case, the Supreme Court decided that the March 2013 acquittal was illogical because the judges had not fully considered all the evidence. The civil judiciary system is structured as follows. [9] Civil code, Penal Code, Administrative code etc. There are two main exceptions to the normal legislative procedure: In general, the judiciary has no power to control legislative and executive actions. National Research Council (IRSIG-CNR), Bologna, Italy; Mr. Francesco Contini, Researcher, the Research Institute on Judicial Systems, National Research Council (IRSIG-CNR), Bologna, Italy; Justice Riaga Samuel Omolo, Judge at the Court of Appeal, Kenya; Justice Dory Reiling, Vice-president, Amsterdam District Court, The Netherlands; Prof. 1368 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<2BC44B71D5E8BD4AA52CEAD376FA45ED>]/Index[1351 26]/Info 1350 0 R/Length 87/Prev 901430/Root 1352 0 R/Size 1377/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream On the other hand, in England lower courts are bound to the Supreme Court precedent and cannot overturn it even if they disagree; they have to apply it, with the only chance to express their disagreement in a dissenting opinion which will invite the party to appeal the decision and which will hopefully persuade the Supreme Court to overrule their judgement. Summing up, English judgements create law. The most relevant are: The Italian Authority on Communications (, The Italian Securities and Exchange Commission (, The Italian Regulatory Authority for Electricity Gas and Water (. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) consists of: The European Court of Justice, which can be summoned by national courts to consider annulments and appeals or to obtain preliminary rulings regarding the interpretation of EU law. The Italian legislature focuses on regulating the relevance and efficiency of evidence presented by the parties to the court rather than on imposing exclusionary rules of evidence before the court. Been appointed as judges of administrative and accounting courts. Therefore, the theoretical distinction between Stare Decisis and Constant Jurisprudence collapses in practice, giving as result two systems that, from opposite starting points, slowly converge each one taking advantage of some positive characteristics of the other realizing two contaminated systems that are better aware of the needs, the wants and the usages of the dynamic and globalized modern society. Thus, despite the need of legal certainty was the same, the solution that Romans adopted pointed in the opposite direction: Justinian, Eastern Roman Emperor, commissioned an encyclopedic work, called Corpus Iuris Civilis, which gathered and harmonized all the roman law in one single, complete Code. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. Another 46 million euros was paid out to . The role of the precedent in the English and Italian judicial system: Between Stare Decisis and Constant Jurisprudence, SUMMARY: 1. The differences between them are of course several and significant, so that one might think that they should be referred as the antipodes of the legal system conception, with no chance of commixture from one to the other. Blacks Law Dictionary (5th ed. Once the applicants have earned a law degree, they can take the exam to become judges without having to have practiced as a lawyer (Grossi, 2010). This means that they are not subject to external pressure of any kind when they execute their functions. Since the very beginning of their development, their differences seemed to be so marked that nobody could even suggest the contrary. This is five days faster than the EU average. Reforming Italy's creaking justice system is one of the toughest tasks facing Prime Minister Mario Draghi's government - and one of the conditions the EU attached to the granting of the . Codice di Procedura Civile, (Regio Decreto 28 ottobre 1940, n. 1443 in G.U. Italian criminal trials: Lost in transition? The Constituent Assembly, specifically appointed for the task, enacted the Constitution in 1947. Judiciary of Italy - Wikipedia Starting a business in Italy can take less time but costs more than the EU average. Italian civil procedural law is governed by the dispositive principle (. Government > Legal system: Countries Compared - NationMaster Judges and prosecutors belong to the same civil service sector, and their positions are interchangeable. However, press must comply with the relevant legal provisions generally governing reporting and privacy rights. The judges are represented by the Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura which is a body chaired by the President of the Republic and includes the public prosecutor of Corte di Cassazione, and university law professors and attorneys with fifteen years of experience (Grossi, 2010). The Italian judicial system consists of a series of courts and a body of judges who are civil servants. Books: They have jurisdiction over the disputes in accordance with territorial jurisdiction rules. An amendment must be submitted to a popular referendum. After this, the public prosecutor can, if necessary for investigative reasons, order that certain documents are kept confidential and/or not published. Applicants for the public competitive examination must have a law degree and one of the following: A PhD or other postgraduate degree from a law school. Foreign scrutiny of the case has so far been unflattering to the Italian legal system (and Italy in general), not helped by the seemingly endless twists and turns of a case that has been running for close to seven years. The law is in fact expression of the people sovereignty, exercised by directly electing their representatives in Parliament (art. The Constitution adopts a model of equal bicameralism. Carlson Laura, American Business Law For Civil Law Lawyers Any of the following can request a referendum within three months of the amendment's publication: One-fifth of the members of a parliamentary house. The role of the precedent in the English and Italian judicial system: Between Stare Decisis and Constant Jurisprudence SUMMARY: 1. Articles 24, 25, 101 to 104 and 111 of the Constitution, in particular, ensure the autonomy and independence of the judiciary. Though the Italian system of laws uses civil law while the United States uses common law (Mondials, N.d.). Copyright 20102023, The Conversation Media Group Ltd, Lecturer in Environmental Art - School of Art and Design.